Volume 1 Supplement 1

Safety in Health

Open Access

Learning and reporting system in a tertiary university hospital compared to the Austrian-wide open access system

  • Gerald Sendlhofer1, 2Email author,
  • Brigitte Kober1,
  • Karina Leitgeb1 and
  • Monika Schanbacher3
Safety in Health20151(Suppl 1):A12

DOI: 10.1186/2056-5917-1-S1-A12

Published: 30 October 2015

Background

Learning and reporting systems (LRS) are used worldwide to support patient safety aspects in healthcare. The goal of a LRS is to increase patient safety on an organizational level as well as in a global manner. However, a LRS can be used in different ways, on the one hand near misses are reported which could have been harmful to patients and on the other hand adverse or sentinel events can also be found in LRS. Furthermore, within Europe differences between countries are eminent, for example in Great Britain the system is used very frequently whereas in Austria a LRS is just used occasionally.

In Austria, a national LRS was implemented and is accessible by the public since 2010 [1]. Within the University Hospital Graz, a LRS was implemented in 2013. The aim of this report is to compare the in-house versus the open access LRS.

Material and methods

In-house:The LRS was piloted for one year in a unit and after evaluation opened in 2013 for all departments and all employees. The LRS is easy to access via the intranet-starting page. Reports are reviewed according to internal guidelines and results of each anonymous report are published in the intranet after a reasonable time. Prior implementation the LRS was promoted in information meetings and within the employees' newspaper and e-newsletter.

Open access:The Austrian-wide national LRS can be used by anyone who has access to the internet. Ongoing reports are sent to experts. The national LRS was promoted within the healthcare community and the public.

Results

Within the in-house LRS 121 reports were handled by the reviewer since September 2013. Within six years of being online 452 incidents were reported to the national LRS, thereof 365 were published in the internet (Table 1).
Table 1

Number of reports in the nation-wide and in-house LRS.

Indication

In-house

Open-access

Reports (n)

121

365

Top 3 of who reported (%)

  

Nurse

38

21

Physician

49

56

Medical technical assistants

4

2

Top 4 disciplines (%)

  

General medicine

-

16

Anesthesia

11

10

Surgery

46

10

Internal Medicine

25

10

Top 4 where did it happen (%)

  

Ward

27

46

Outpatient clinic

15

8

Operating theatre

20

-

Intensive care unit

7

-

Conclusions

Over a period of 11 years the NHS LRS implicates that approximately 2,000 incidents are reported per day (60,000 per month) by healthcare professionals to the national LRS [2]. The national LRS of Austria and the in-house LRS receives approximately 6 reports per month. For the national LRS it is obvious, that the LRS is only used by healthcare professionals and not by the public. Reason could be that the national LRS is not well known at all. Overall, the number of reports is very low when compared to NHS-data. Cultural difference between the countries might be the most dominant reason for the low response rate in Austria.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the entire organization and their employees for supporting patient safety initiatives.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Quality and Risk Management, University Hospital Graz
(2)
Division of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz
(3)
Division of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Graz

References

Copyright

© Sendlhofer et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement