Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics (type of research, country of origin and concepts explored) of the 16 articles that met inclusion criteria

From: Middle managers’ role in quality improvement project implementation, are we all on the same page? – A review of current literature

Characteristic

No (%) total

Type of Article

 

 Primary Research

  Qualitative

  Mixed Methods

 Literature Review

 Conceptual

9 (56.3)

7 (43.7)

3 (18.8)

2 (12.5)

4 (25.0)

Country of Origin

 

 Australia

 Canada

 Ireland

 Finland

 Sweden

 United Kingdom

 United States

1 (6.25)

1 (6.25)

1 (6.25)

1 (6.25)

1 (6.25)

2 (12.5)

4 (25)

Clinical Setting

 

 Acute (non-specific)

 Primary Care (non-specific)

 Mixed Clinical settings

 Homecare

 Non-Health Care

6 (37.5)

4 (25)

5 (31.3)

1 (6.25)

1 (6.25)

Various Stakeholders’ Perspective of the Middle Managers’ Role in QI Implementation

Middle Managers’ own perception of their role in project implementation

Description of the facilitators and barriers middle managers face in project implementation

8 (50.0)

4 (25.0)

2 (12.5)