- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
Results from the Implementation of a Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) at an Interventional Radiology Unit
© Schnedl et al. 2015
- Published: 30 October 2015
- Interventional Procedure
- Safety Culture
- Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage
- Pilot Phase
- Internal Audit
Therefore, a surgical safety checklist (SSC) was implemented in a pilot phase to improve and optimize patient's safety during interventional procedures at the division for vascular and interventional radiology in autumn 2014, where on average 4,000 procedures/per year are performed.
The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to analyze SSC-compliance in order to adapt and ameliorate it, respectively.
The SSC adapted from the WHO SSC to local circumstances consisted of three phases comprising the sign-in (SI) phase (before administration of anesthesia), the team time out (TTO) and sign out (SO) phases (comprising the core interventional procedure).
Figure 1 shows the implemented SSC with its three items, which has to be fully checked and marked before continuing the next procedural step by the responsible expert.
To assess the SSC compliance rate an internal audit was performed for two days (October 14th and 15th 2015) in the pilot phase. The SSCs were compared to performed operations by the Department of Quality and Risk Management as the number of collected SSCs was matched with scheduled and definitely performed operations. Corresponding data were gained from hospital's electronic documentation system.
The primary endpoint included the use of the SSC generally as well as the respective completion rate in cases the SSC was used.
Data were analyzed descriptively, using absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables.
On October 14 th/15th, 1 month after starting the pilot phase, the SSC was used in 42.3% (11/26) of interventional procedures. Within used SSCs, 27.3% (3/11) were complete, while 72.7% (8/11) were partially complete (Figure 2).
As summarized by Treadwell , barriers to SSC implementation generally consist of confusion regarding the proper use of the checklist, pragmatic challenges to efficient work flow and individual beliefs and attitudes.
Especially for short and periodical interventional procedures (i.e. change of nephrostomy catheter, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage et al.) and emergency cases as the responsible interventional radiologist is pressed for time, the implemented SSC was seen as a burden for a fluently workflow.
Furthermore, the short time span of the SSC implementation pilot phase and the first internal audit may be responsible for the relatively low adherence.
Consecutively, repetitive outsourced training and assessment of the involved healthcare professionals might be a reasonable tool to improve the use of the surgical safety checklist.
- Battles JB, Lilford RJ: Organizing patient safety research to identify risks and hazards. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003, 12 (Suppl 2): ii2-ii7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ginsburg LR, Tregunno D, Norton PG, Mitchell JI, Howley H: 'Not another safety culture survey: using the Canadian patient safety climate survey (Can-PSCS) to measure provider perceptions of PSC across health settings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014, 23 (2): 162-170.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY: Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014, 23 (4): 299-318.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.